Orvis v. Garms
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Chief Judge.
In this action the plaintiffs seek to establish easements for ingress and egress along the route of a road across property owned by the defendants. They also seek the removal of gates and installation of cattle guards. The trial court denied those requests. Their petition sought such relief on a variety of bases varying from public road to prescription. However, before this court the plaintiffs Judy and Or vis rest their claim upon prescription and the plaintiffs Trill upon necessity.
Review of this case does not hinge upon the opportunity of the trial court to have judged…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dalton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Riggs v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Three-O-Three Investments, Inc. v. MoffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Vossen v. DautelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Carpenter-Union Hills Cemetery Ass'n v. Camp Zoe, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- King v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- MacIos v. HensleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Baetje v. EisenbeisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kikta v. HughesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.