Legal Opinion
Kikta v. Hughes
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1988No. 8878PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
From a judgment and decree quieting title in plaintiffs Mildred Kikta, Irene Kikta, and Theresa Kikta (Kiktas), defendant James L. Hughes (Hughes) appeals the denial of his private easement claim and his motion for a new trial. Hughes raises two issues on appeal: (1) error in dismissing his private easement claim and (2) abuse of discretion in denying the motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
This appeal was originally filed by defendant Hughes and defendants Albert T. Gonzales and Virginia Q. Gonzales (Gonzaleses). Kiktas moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Waller v. HildebrechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Stout v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Varos v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brooks v. TannerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Balestra v. ButtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Luevano v. Group OneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Camino Sin Pasada Neighborhood Ass'n v. RockstrohNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Mayer v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- CAMINO SIN PASADA NEIGHBORHOOD v. RockstrohNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.