Parrish v. Jones
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Parrish v. Jones, 138 Ohio St.3d 23,
2013-Ohio-5224.] PARRISH, ADMR., APPELLEE, v. JONES ET AL.; SKOCIK ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Parrish v. Jones, 138 Ohio St.3d 23,
2013-Ohio-5224.] Directed verdict—Civ.R. 50—Trial court should exercise great caution in sustaining a motion for a directed verdict on the opening statement of counsel—Although a trial court is not required to consider allegations contained in the pleadings when ruling on a motion for directed verdict made on the opening statement of an opponent, the pleadings may be used by the court in liberally construing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Brinkmoeller v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Parrish v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Parrish v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022