Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2013No. 2012-0623PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Parrish v. Jones, 138 Ohio St.3d 23,

2013-Ohio-5224.] PARRISH, ADMR., APPELLEE, v. JONES ET AL.; SKOCIK ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Parrish v. Jones, 138 Ohio St.3d 23,

2013-Ohio-5224.] Directed verdict—Civ.R. 50—Trial court should exercise great caution in sustaining a motion for a directed verdict on the opening statement of counsel—Although a trial court is not required to consider allegations contained in the pleadings when ruling on a motion for directed verdict made on the opening statement of an opponent, the pleadings may be used by the court in liberally construing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brinkmoeller v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Parrish v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Parrish v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API