Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2013No. 2012-0623PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*24Lanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} We accepted this certified conflict to determine whether a trial court must consider the allegations set forth in the pleadings in addition to the opening statement when ruling on a motion for directed verdict made at the close of an opponent’s opening statement. We hold that although a trial court is not required to consider allegations contained in the pleadings when ruling on a motion for directed verdict made on the opening statement of an opponent, the pleadings may be used by the court in liberally construing the opening statement in favor of the party against whom…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brinkmoeller v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Parrish v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Graham (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. RamosOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Middleton v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Neth. Ins. Co. v. BSHM Architects, Inc., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2018
  5. Webster v. ShawOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API