Croasman v. Kincaid
Oregon Supreme Court
From Marion: H. EL Hewitt, Judge. Mandamus by A. B. Croasman to compel Harrison R. Kincaid, secretary of state, to audit a claim. A demurrer to the writ was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Wolverton.
This case was argued and submitted with the case of Shattuck v. Kincaid, just decided, 31 Or. 379 (49 Pac. 758), and upon the same briefs. The claim involved is one preferred against the state by plaintiff for supplies furnished at the instance and request of the superintendent of the state penitentiary, for the use of said institution, which are alleged to be of the reasonable value of $20. The bill constituting the claim, was itemized and sworn to by the claimant, certified to as correct by the superintendent, and presented to the secretary of state with a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Swann v. BuckMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
- Shattuck v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Miller v. County Court of Tucker CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- Dechert v. Commonwealth ex rel. SmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Burton v. . FurmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Olds v. KirkpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Chase v. PreusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Trippeer v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Irwin v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897