Irwin v. Kincaid
Oregon Supreme Court
From Marion: Henry H. Hewitt, Judge. Mandamus by the Irwin-Hodson Company to compel Harrison R. Kincaid, secretary of state, to audit a claim, and draw his warrant for it. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
This case involves the question whether the secretary of state ought to be required to audit and allow and draw his warrant upon the treasurer for $221.50, the amount of a certain claim in favor of plaintiff which is for ruling and binding thirty-three volumes of assessment and tax rolls and ruling recapitulation sheets, at the instance and request of the secretary. *479He is authorized to incur the expense by section 2848, Hill’s Ann. Laws, which is as follows: “The secretary of state shall from time to time, as he may deem proper, cause to be printed blank assessment rolls and other forms for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shattuck v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Croasman v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Trippeer v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 1923