Legal Opinion

Cozine v. Graham & Bleeker

New York Court of Chancery

Decided April 20, 1830PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Tbe complainant was the owner of about' 16 acres of land in the. city of New-York. ■ He employed the defendant Bleeker to Sell the same at auction., .'The-land was. sold by the , acre; By the terms of the sale, ten per cent, was to be paid ■immediately, ten per cent; upon the delivery of the dé.ed, and the residue, with interest, was to be secured by bond and a mortgage upon the premises.

Read the full summary

Tbe complainant was the owner of about' 16 acres of land in the. city of New-York. ■ He employed the defendant Bleeker to Sell the same at auction., .'The-land was. sold by the , acre; By the terms of the sale, ten per cent, was to be paid ■immediately, ten per cent; upon the delivery of the dé.ed, and the residue, with interest, was to be secured by bond and a mortgage upon the premises. The-defendant,-Graham became the purchaser, and paid to the auctioneer ten per cent. towards the purchase money. , It being ascertained that one of the avenues of the city .covered a-small part of the…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The objection raised by the demurrer in this case, is as to a matter of form and not of sub-- . stance; ' A contract- for the sale of lands is alleged to have been made between the parties, of which the complainant claims a specific performance; but it does not distinctly ap- , ' pear by the bill whether it was o.r was not reduced to Writing and- signed, in such manner' as is required by the statute of frauds. The estate Was sold at adetion, and if the auction*179eer did his duty by entering on the conditions of sale the name of the purchaser and the amount of his bid in the usual…

2Cited by55 opinions

  1. Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Harris v. KnickerbackerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  4. Duffy v. . O'DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API