Montgomery v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Georgia
Motion to dismiss the writ oí error.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.
1. “A direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, which does not assign error upon any final judgment will not be entertained by this court.” Newberry v. Tenant, 121 Ga. 561; Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co., 120 Ga., 899; Harrell v. Tift, 70 Ga. 730; Trustees etc. v. Merchants and Planters National Bank, 62 Ga. 284; Barge v. Robinson, 115 Ga. 41.
2. In so far as the case of Haslcins v. Bank, 100 Ga. 216, and cases which follow it, are in- conflict with the ruling here made, they have been practically overruled. Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co., 120 Ga. 899-901.
3. In the case of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newberry v. TenantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Harrell v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Haskins v. Bank of the StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Barge v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Scarborough v. HolderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Magid v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Hendricks v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.