Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Tift

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A case cannot be brought to this court for adjudication by direct ex- . ception solely to a ruling made pendente lite. There must be a valid exception to some final ruling of the court below, on which to predicate other assignments of error

(a.) A bill of exceptions stated that the defendant below offered a certain document in evidence, which was rejected, on objection by *731the plaintiff, “to which ruling and decision of the court in refusing to admit said evidence and in sustaining the objection of plaintiff, defendant excepts. The defendant having offered no other testimony, the case was…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Good v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Bridges v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API