Wilcox v. Luco
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of tbe Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating a judgment. J. M. Sea-well, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHabeis On, J.
The defendant made his promissory note to the plaintiff for the sum of two thousand dollars, and in an action brought against him thereon in the superior court for San Francisco suffered default, and judgment was rendered against him and in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of the note. Thereafter upon his motion, based upon his affidavit that at and prior to the commencement of the action and ever since he had been consul general of the republic of Chili, residing in San *641Francisco and engaged in performing tbe functions'of bis office, tbe court vacated and set aside tbis judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Börs v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bradbury v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HesterlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Flores v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Scott v. HobeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.