Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Franke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. Action by Zimmerman against Franke, to perpetually enjoin the defendant from prosecuting certain garnishment proceedings in the county court of Eichardson county, Nebraska. Trial by the court, and judgment for defendant, December 6, 1884. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion contains a statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by William M. Zimmerman in the district court of Atchison county, against H. Franke, to perpetually enjoin the defendant from prosecuting certain garnishment proceedings in the county court of Eichardson county, Nebraska. Both parties are residents of Atchison county, Kansas; and it is claimed by the plaintiff that the defendant is prosecuting his said garnishment proceedings in Nebraska for the purpose of applying the personal earnings of the plaintiff as a brakeman on the Missouri Pacific Eailway, to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CochranTexas Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Seymour, Sabin & Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. SwinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Wilson v. JosephIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State Ex Rel. Lankford v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. McMahonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API