Anderson v. Canaday
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Woodward County; B. F. Loofbourrow, Judge. Action by Roy 0. Canaday against A. W. Anderson and another. From judgment for. plaintiff, the defendant named brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROSSER, C.
The only question involved in this case is the sufficiency of the petition. The petition alleges that the plaintiff is a married man, residing with his family in Woodward county, state of Oklahoma; that the defendants, J. W. Holmes and A. W. Anderson, also reside in that county; that during the months of January and February, 1908, plaintiff was employed by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company; that a line of that company’s road extends into the state of Missouri; that it maintains offices in both Oklahoma and Missouri, and has officials in each state upon whom…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burnap v. MarshIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Hoosac Tunnel Dock & Elevator Co. v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Greer v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Donald Dean Walker, Debtor. Donald Dean Walker v. Kenneth G.M. Mather, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gaar v. N. Myrtle Beach Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.