Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided October 31, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 196356PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

The appeals in this action involve the application of the ownership and permissive use provisions of section 402, subdivision (a), of the Vehicle Code.

Mrs. Pollard’s 1949 Cadillac, while being operated by her daughter, Mrs. Wilson, collided with and damaged plaintiff’s automobile. Mrs. Pollard had delivered the Cadillac, together with the registration certificates, duly indorsed, to Mr. Wilson, sales manager of a secondhand automobile sales lot, only for the purposes of sale. Mrs. Pollard gave no express permission to her daughter to operate the Cadillac on the day *846of the accident, but had,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Shuba v. GreendonnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Steele v. NagelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Campbell v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Gams v. OberholtzerWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rody v. WinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API