Legal Opinion

Austin v. Van Horn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1930No. Calendar 34,022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

Plaintiff, by petition, informed the court that Lawrence J. Maloney and the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company contumaciously refuse to abide and obey our mandatory decree entered April 12, 1929, in the case of Austin v. Van Horn. The opinion in that case is reported in 245 Mich. 344. In response to our order to show cause, Mr. Maloney, the present owner of the property involved, and the Tea company, lessee of the property, filed separate answers setting up circumstances in excuse of their disobedience. The mandate of the decree has been disobeyed by Mr. Maloney and the Tea company, in that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. Van HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Craig v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bigham v. LocklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API