Legal Opinion

Bigham v. Locklin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1936No. Docket Nos. 78, 79, Calendar Nos. 38,897, 38,898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs Mary MacMicliael and others, owners of lots and homes in Russell Woods subdivision of part of quarter-sections 11 and 12, of the 10,000-acre tract, in the city of Detroit, who purchased subject to the building restrictions hereinafter mentioned, July 3, 1935, filed a bill of complaint against defendants Charles R. Locklin and others to restrain the erection, on lots 1 and 2 of that subdivision, of an oil and gasoline station which plaintiffs claimed defendants were about to erect in violation of the restrictions, to their damage and injury. A temporary injunction was issued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. Van HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kaplan v. City of Huntington WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rairigh v. CarnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. DeMarco v. PalazzoloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API