Legal Opinion
Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC v. United States Department of Interior
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 18, 2009No. Civil Action 08-2218 (RWR)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC brings claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., against the United States Department of Interior (“DOI”), the DOI Secretary in his official capacity, 1 and the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), asserting that the decision by the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) to approve permits to drill oil and gas wells on protected federal land violates federal law. Yates Petroleum Corp. intervened as a defendant and now moves to transfer venue. Because…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Douglas v. Chariots for HireDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Sheffer v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Tower Labs., Ltd. v. Lush Cosmetics Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Taylor v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- New Hope Power Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.