Legal Opinion

JA v. Royal Oak School District

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 4, 2025No. 4:23-cv-13106Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION J.A. and M.A. o/b/o G.A., Case No. 23-cv-13106 Plaintiffs, Hon. F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge Royal Oak School District, Hon. Curtis Ivy, Jr. U.S. Magistrate Judge Defendant. ___________________________ / OPINION AND ORDER ON IDEA APPEAL (ECF Nos. 26, 27) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs in this case are the parents of thirteen-year-old G.A. (“Student”). G.A. is eligible for special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),

20 U.S.C. § 1400

et seq. Parents…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API