Legal Opinion
Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of Education
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 16, 2004No. 03-5396PublishedCited by 193 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARBLEY, District Judge.
This case arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”), and corresponding Tennessee laws and rules. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Maureen and Phillip Deal (the “Deals”), bring this action for and on behalf of their autistic son, Zachary. Defendant-Appellee is the Board of Education of Hamilton County, Tennessee (the “School System”). Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the decision of the district court reversing in part and affirming in part the decision of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) who presided over the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- M.H. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Bryant Ex Rel. D.B. v. New York State Education DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- D.B. Ex Rel. Elizabeth B. v. EspositoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- R.P. Ex Rel. C.P. v. Prescott Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- T.P. & S.P. Ex Rel. S.P. v. Mamaroneck Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.