Legal Opinion

Valley Bank v. Estate of Rainsdon

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1990No. 17614PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This action is between two secured creditors who claim priority in the proceeds from the sale of the debtor’s collateral. The district court granted summary judgment to Thelma Rainsdon, holding that she and her late husband, Burton, had a purchase money security interest which was of first priority. The other secured creditor, Valley Bank, has appealed. We are asked to decide whether Burton and Thelma Rainsdon timely perfected their purchase money security interest. We hold that the security interest was not timely perfected under I.C. § 28-9-312(4). We vacate the summary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Automated Bookbinding Services, Inc., Bankrupt. Finance Company of America v. Hans Mueller CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  2. North Platte State Bank v. Production Credit Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Whitworth v. KruegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Brodie Hotel Supply, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. International Harvester Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Commercial Automotive Finance, Inc. v. Spartan Motors, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Home Bank & Trust Co. v. Cedar Bluff Cattle Feeders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API