Home Bank & Trust Co. v. Cedar Bluff Cattle Feeders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Marquardt, J.:
Cedar Bluff Cattle Feeders, Inc., and its assignee, Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., (Cedar Bluff) appeal from the decision of the district court that they did not have a purchase money security interest involving cattle. In the alternative, Cedar Bluff argues that it is entitled to be paid for the costs of caring for and feeding the cattle from the time that it repossessed them. Cedar Bluff also argues that the district court should not have awarded prejudgment interest to Home Bank & Trust Company (Home Bank).
C. C. Cattle Company, Inc., (C. C. Cattle) buys, grazes, and sells cattle. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- J. W. Thompson Co. v. Welles Products Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- North Platte State Bank v. Production Credit Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- T.S.I. Holdings, Inc. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Brodie Hotel Supply, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cornelius v. Bank of Nova ScotiaSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999