Legal Opinion

Trimper v. Bruno-Sherman Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 25, 1977No. Civ. 76-72107PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHURCHILL, District Judge.

The plaintiff, James Allen Trimper, was injured while using a press and brings this products liability action to recover damages, pursuant to the court’s diversity jurisdiction. The motion for summary judgment requires this Court to make a determination under Michigan law with respect to the scope of the products liability doctrine created by the Michigan supreme court in Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co., 397 Mich. 406, 244 N.W.2d 873 (1976).

The expansive nature of liability concepts in products liability cases in Michigan is not only demonstrated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Shane v. Hobam, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Ortiz v. South Bend LatheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Bathory v. Procter & Gamble Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Elbie Mozingo, Cross-Appellee v. Correct Manufacturing Corporation and G.W. Way, Correct Manufacturing Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Clarence Tucker, Jr. And Jean Tucker v. Paxson MacHine Company, William Thropp & Sons Company, Division of J.M.L. Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Meisel v. M & N Modern Hydraulic Press Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Nieves v. Bruno Sherman Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Korzetz v. Amsted Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API