Legal Opinion

State v. Nicholson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8520SC554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of forging an endorsement, uttering a forged endorsement, and conspiracy to commit felonious forgery. Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his mo*399tions to dismiss the forging and uttering charges and the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash the conspiracy indictment. Regarding the substantive offenses, defendant argues the evidence was insufficient to go to the jury because the State did not introduce into evidence the check allegedly forged and uttered. As to the conspiracy indictment, defendant argues it should have been quashed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. Van PeltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API