Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Hoch

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1917No. 23,057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Pulaski Circuit Court; Charles H. Peters, Special Judge. Drainage proceeding on the petition of Jane Hoch and others. From the judgment rendered, Mary A. Boyles and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by certain of the appellees before the board of commissioners of Pulaski county for the establishment of a public drain in that county. The "petition was regularly docketed as *95an action pending and the matter referred to drainage commissioners, who subsequently filed a report favorable to the proposed improvement. Within ten days thereafter appellants, who are the owners as tenants in common of certain land to be affected by the drain in question, joined in filing with the auditor of Pulaski county a remonstrance for cause, but this remonstrance was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ditton v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Gilbert v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Helms v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Hartlage v. Louisville & Northern Railway & Lighting Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad v. First Trust & Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Hessong v. WolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Phrommer v. Albers, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API