Legal Opinion

Ditton v. Hart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1911No. 21,464PublishedCited by 39 opinions

From Warren Circuit Court; James T. Saunders, Judge. Action by Abigail H. Hart and others against Minerva H. Ditton and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellees against appellants to contest the will of Jane Hawkins, deceased, after probate, on the alleged grounds that the testatrix was of unsound mind when the will was executed, that the will was procured by undue influence, and that it was unduly executed.

A trial of said cause resulted in a general verdict in favor of appellees, and over a motion for a new trial final judgment was rendered setting aside said will. The only errors assigned and not waived call in question the action of the court in overruling appellants’ joint motion for a new trial.

It is…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Marx v. . McGlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ginter v. GinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Waterman v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Mishawaka St. Joseph. L. T. Co. v. Neu, Gdn.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Watson v. BurnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Muncie & Portland Traction Co. v. Citizens Gas & Oil Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Robbins v. FugitIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API