NJD, LTD. v. City of San Dimas
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
NJD, Ltd., plaintiff, appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants, the City of San Dimas (the city) and its city council. On appeal, plaintiff contends Judge Judith Ashmann-Gerst erroneously denied an in limine motion in connection with a facial regulatory takings challenge to amendments to the city’s municipal code which restricted construction in a hillside area. Plaintiff further argues that Judge David P. Yaffe incorrectly denied its mandate petition alleging violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, 1 § 21000 et…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Allegretti & Co. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Utah Public Employees Ass'n v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Natkin v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Avenida San Juan Partnership v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.