Legal Opinion

Donald C. Clemmer, Director, Department of Corrections for the District of Columbia v. Nathan H. Alexander

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 28, 1961No. 16437_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

The question is whether the Indigent Prisoners’ Act, set forth in pertinent part in the margin, 1 is applicable to an indigent prisoner sentenced by the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia on a conviction of vagrancy, infra n. 7. The District Court held that the Act was applicable and ordered appellee restored to his liberty upon compliance with its pauper’s oath provision. He thereupon took the oath before a United States Commissioner. The present appeal from the order of the District Court is by the Director of the Department of Corrections for the District of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. PeakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
  3. Vogel v. WongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank A. Tate v. United States of America, Robert M. Edelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Norma J. Goode v. Carson Markley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Sawyer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Winkler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Winkler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API