Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1998No. 20186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRIMITSU, Judge.

The instant case 1 presents the issue of how a trial court should submit the statutory presumption contained in Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-801(4) (1993), see infra n. 9, to the jury without violating a defendant’s right to due process of law. We hold that, pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of Evidence (HRE) Rule 306 and relevant case law, a trial court must advise a jury that the statutory presumption contained in HRS § 708-801(4) is a permissive inference of fact and thus not binding upon the jury as factfinders, otherwise the defendant’s due process rights are violated.

I.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CabreraHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Schnabel.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. ShinyamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MarkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. WhitakerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API