State v. Mitchell
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KIRIMITSU, Judge.
The instant case 1 presents the issue of how a trial court should submit the statutory presumption contained in Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-801(4) (1993), see infra n. 9, to the jury without violating a defendant’s right to due process of law. We hold that, pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of Evidence (HRE) Rule 306 and relevant case law, a trial court must advise a jury that the statutory presumption contained in HRS § 708-801(4) is a permissive inference of fact and thus not binding upon the jury as factfinders, otherwise the defendant’s due process rights are violated.
I.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CabreraHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Schnabel.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ShinyamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MarkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. WhitakerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.