Womack v. Lovell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
In their rock-and-roll standard, “End of the Innocence,” Bruce Hornsby and Don Henley note that “The lawyers dwell on small details.” That’s true. We have to. The devil isn’t the only resident in the details; sometimes truth and fairness lodge there as well. ■
In this case, we address a “detail” that was lost or hidden and resulted in what we consider an injustice. Fortunately, as is usually the case, painstaking attention to other small details enables us to correct this injustice. If you dwell on small details with an eye to fairness, the law…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Major v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Barron v. Galvin CA5California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Bundick v. Penny Mac Loan Services CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.