Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Schoellkopf

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1933No. 2834PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTHALL, Justice.

We adopt plaintiff’s statement of the nature and result of the suit as found in their' brief as concisely stating the issues. It is substantially as follows:

This suit was instituted in the district court of Dallas county, Tex., by J. Fred Schoell-kopf and Hugo W. Schoellkopf as plaintiffs in the respective capacities alleged in their petition, on the 9th day of November, 1927. The suit was against Henry M. Sutton, Walter L. Steele, and Edwin G. Steele, as defendants, upon two separate causes of action; the first action being upon a promissory note in the principal sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Dolson v. De GanahlTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Helmke v. PrasifkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Hoffer Oil Corp. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. SeipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Schultze v. SchultzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rust v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API