Legal Opinion

Rust v. Rust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1935No. 13240Published

1Opinion

On Second Motion for Rehearing.

BROWN, Justice.

Defendant in error, in his brief and in his motion for a rehearing, ignores the principle of law that governs the disposition of this cause.

If there be a bona fide claim on the part of A that B owes him, and B executes a note to A because of such contention, B cannot raise, as a defense, no consideration for the execution of the note. The consideration is the settlement between the parties, based on the claim made.

The evidence in this case establishes, without dispute, that plaintiff in error asserted what he believed to be a bona fide claim that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Camoron v. ThurmondTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gilliam v. AlfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. French v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. O'Fiel v. JanesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Parker v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API