Legal Opinion

National Forge & Ordnance Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1957No. 132-56PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Defendant in its motion says we failed to pass on its defense of the inadequacy of the claim for refund as a predicate for its present suit. We noted this defense but we overlooked mentioning it, because we thought it was clearly without merit.

Now that we have been asked to pass on it, we take the occasion to make a few brief comments on this defense in general.

Attorneys for the Government frequently ask us to apply to claims for refund a requirement of particularity almost as strict as is customarily applied to indictments for crime.1 The rule of strictissimi juris is not applicable to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Landers, Frary & Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. L. E. Myers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Berner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. Continental Foundry & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. National Newark & Essex Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API