Legal Opinion

National Newark & Essex Bank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 16, 1969No. 59-68PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, Judge

Plaintiff executors seek a refund of $37,450.85, pins interest, allegedly constituting an overassessment of estate taxes levied upon the estate of William Clark Symington, deceased. The central question is whether plaintiffs, before suing in this court, filed a valid administrative claim for refund, as required by 26 U.S.C § 7422(a) (1964). As that statute directs, a suit for refund cannot be maintained in this court unless and until a claim for refund has been duly filed with the Internal Eevenue Service. Rosengarten v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 287, 181 F. Snpp. 275, cert. denied, 364 U.S.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Real Estate - Land Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joseph P. Lucia v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Sun Chemical Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. New England Electric System v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Joseph P. Lucia v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. National Newark & Essex Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API