Legal Opinion

Landers, Frary & Clark v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1957No. 95-53PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

1. Plaintiff sustained a net loss in 1946. Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 it is entitled, under certain conditions, to carry back this loss to 1944 and 1945, and deduct it from its income for those years. In computing the loss in 1946 plaintiff claims it is entitled to take into account *871additional excess profits taxes asserted by the Eevenue Agent to be due for the years 1942,1948 and 1944. It says it can take these additional taxes into account in 1946 because, prior thereto, it had contested liability for them, but, after extended discussion with the Eevenue Agent of the various…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Lewyt Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Chestnut Securities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Riss & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  3. National Forge & Ordnance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. HB Zachry Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API