Legal Opinion

United States v. Durham

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 6, 1955No. Cr. 116451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, District Judge.

I have before me an oral motion to allow defendant to appeal without prepayment of costs and to enlarge him on bail pending appeal. He has made affidavit of inability to pay such costs, but has given no explanation as to how he expects to raise the money to pay the premium on a bail bond.

An appeal in forma pauperis may not be taken if the trial judge certifies that it is not taken-in good faith.1 “Good faith” has been construed by the United States Court of Appeals for this Circuit to mean the existence of a “substantial question,” or one which has merit and is not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. George Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  4. Barry v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  5. Wheeler v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Busch v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
  2. In Re RosenfieldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  3. Monte W. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. DeSantis v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
  5. Jackson v. The Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of The City of PrichardDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API