Legal Opinion

Monte W. Durham v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 3, 1956No. 12810_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Circuit Judge.

On Durham’s former appeal, we reversed his conviction of housebreaking and remanded the case for a new trial because the trial court had erroneously applied “existing rules governing the burden of proof on the defense of insanity * * 1 In addition, we announced a new test of criminal responsibility. Upon re-trial, Durham has again been convicted. 2 We must again reverse and remand for a new trial because of fatally defective instructions to the jury.

The judge told the jury that the Acting Superintendent of St. Elizabeths Hospital had advised the court on February 12,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. George Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Gunther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Dale Estin Birdsell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Dallas O. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. Winfred Overholser, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital v. John D. LeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API