Ste. Marie v. Wells
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action of Tort for fraud in the sale of a farm, and a count in trover. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1918, Orleans County, Slack, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Moulton, Superior -Judge.
This is an action in tort for ■deceit in the sale of a certain farm by defendant to plaintiff, with a count for the conversion of certain personal property. Trial was had by jury, with verdict and judgment for. the plaintiff. The ease is here on exceptions by defendant. . -
The defendant excepted to the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury in accordance with six requests to .charge made by him. It appears that these requests were not submitted to plaintiff’s counsel before the opening argument for defendant ■as required by County Court Rule 30. But it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crompton v. BeedleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Latremouille v. Bennington & Rutland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1891
- Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- French v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
- Dean v. American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.