Legal Opinion
KOMATSU MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 7, 1955No. 3-55, 4-55, 5-55PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
The defendant has made a motion, in each of these three cases, to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition upon the ground that it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The petitions allege that the plaintiffs were contractors with the United States which acted through the Department of the Army. As such contractors they were engaged in rebuilding engineering equipment in Japan, for the Army. Under their contracts, they were to be paid for work upon its completion. While many items of work were partly finished, the contract periods expired, and new contracts were made,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- United States v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Myerle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
3Cited by24 opinions
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Joseph Bell, Sophie Karp, Hyman M. Oberman, Lena Smith, the Rainier Company, Inc., a Dissolved Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy v. Contel Advanced Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- S.W. Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.