United States v. Segal
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Defendants Michael Segal and Near North Insurance Brokerage, Inc. (“Near North” or “NNIB”) have filed, collectively, three different motions to dismiss, (R. 129-1; R. 146-1; R. 147-1), in which they argue that: (1) the second superseding indictment should be dismissed because prosecuting them would violate their due process rights; and (2) specified counts in the second superseding indictment fail to properly allege that Near North or Segal violated a criminal statute. They have also filed two motions for a bill of particulars, (R. 136-1;…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. William Haskell FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. SorichDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. MarzookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. RadleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.