Legal Opinion

United States v. Radley

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 11, 2008No. 07 CR 689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.

In this novel criminal case, the government charges Mark David Radley (“Rad-ley”), James Warren Summers (“Summers”), Cody Dean Claborn (“Claborn”) and Carrie Kienenberger (“Kienenberger”) (collectively “Defendants”), with conspiring to corner the market and manipulate the price of propane in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., and other federal laws. (R. 1, Indictment.) Defendants move to dismiss the indictment for lack of venue, or, alternatively, for a transfer of venue to the Southern District of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Robert M. Morrison, Michael Anderson, James D. Walton, Sean Foley, and Jose Andrini-VargaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Russell Lee EbersoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Premium Plus Partners, L.P. v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. United States v. BalsigerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API