Legal Opinion

Masto v. Gypsum Resources, LLC

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2013No. 59557PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified four questions to this court regarding the constitutionality of Nevada Senate Bill No. 358, S.B. 358, 72d Leg. (Nev. 2003), in which the Nevada Legislature adopted amendments to Nevada law that prohibit Clark County from rezoning land in certain areas adjacent to Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area, including 2,500 acres owned by respondent Gypsum Resources, LLC. Those questions are: (1) Does S.B. 358 violate Article 4, Section 20 of the Nevada Constitution because it is a “local…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. List v. County of DouglasNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Washoe County Water Conservation District v. BeemerNevada Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cauble v. BeemerNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Damus v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Clean Water Coalition v. the M Resort, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Abarca (Ivan) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Bonham (Bryan) v. The Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Bonham (Bryan) v. The Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Braunstein (Steve) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Braunstein (Steve) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API