Winbun v. Moore
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
Talmadge, J.*
(dissenting) — I dissent in this case because the majority lends further confusion to when a civil cause of action in Washington accrues for purposes of a discovery *224rule associated with a statute of limitations. Moreover, the majority gives short shrift to numerous Washington cases that have addressed and resolved the issue of when a person should have known of the existence of a cause of action. The discovery rule in RCW 4.16.350 is intended to strike a balance between the needs of patients to obtain legal relief for the later discovered consequences of medical malpractice and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.