Legal Opinion · Dissent

Winbun v. Moore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2001No. 68967-9Published

1Dissent

Talmadge, J.*

(dissenting) — I dissent in this case because the majority lends further confusion to when a civil cause of action in Washington accrues for purposes of a discovery *224rule associated with a statute of limitations. Moreover, the majority gives short shrift to numerous Washington cases that have addressed and resolved the issue of when a person should have known of the existence of a cause of action. The discovery rule in RCW 4.16.350 is intended to strike a balance between the needs of patients to obtain legal relief for the later discovered consequences of medical malpractice and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API