Sullivan v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal, we consider whether the district court’s entry of an amended judgment of conviction provided good cause to extend the one-year limitation set forth in NRS 34.726(1) for filing a timely post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We conclude that because the claims presented in appellant’s post-conviction petition were unrelated to the district court’s clerical amendment, the entry of the amended judgment in this case did not provide good cause to excuse appellant’s failure to raise the claims asserted in his petition within the statutory deadline.
FACTS
On…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lozada v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Hathaway v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HaberstrohNevada Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- State v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Steven W. Collier v. Bob BayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Whitehead v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2017
- State v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.