Gregory Jean-Paul v. Timothy Douma
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Gregory Jean-Paul, a Wisconsin prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 arguing that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel on his direct criminal appeal in state court. The district court denied relief. We affirm the judgment because the state appellate court reasonably concluded that his waiver was knowing and intelligent.
I. Background
Jean-Paul was convicted in 2007 of state drug crimes and sentenced to 13 years’ confinement and 12 years’ extended supervision.' He appealed, but vacillated on whether he…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. David RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Al-Bitar v. DennisonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Alcantar v. MorganthalerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Alexander v. LawrenceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Ardell v. WiersmaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.