United States v. David Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
After a jury trial, David Rodriguez was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and conspiracy to possess and distribute pseudoephedrine. He appealed. Although he was initially represented by counsel, he filed a request to proceed pro se, which was granted by this court. On direct appeal, we affirmed the district court’s judgment. See United States v. Rodriguez, 521 Fed.Appx. 313 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 126, 187 L.Ed.2d 89 (2013).
Rodriguez subsequently filed a pro se § 2255 motion, arguing that he did' not intelligently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Myers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Edward J. Arlt, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- David L. Mack v. William French Smith, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Alvin Urial Goodwin III v. Gary L Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garza v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- Nweme v. United States AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
- Stephanie Bekendam v. TDCJ-CID/ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Frank PateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. James FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.