Legal Opinion

Mayo v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Boston

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1986No. C-4621PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment against Steve and Diane Mayo in their suit against John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company of Boston, Massachusetts. The court of appeals affirmed the summary judgment, 695 S.W.2d 724. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause for trial.

Steve Mayo was employed by Hutron Aerospace Company and was covered by a group insurance policy issued by John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. The policy provided maternity benefits. It further provided that coverage would end upon termination of employment.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Mayo v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Anderson v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Berry Property Management, Inc. v. Bliskey, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  4. Underwriters Life Insurance Co. v. Cobb, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Winkle Chevy-Olds-Pontiac, Inc. v. Condon, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API