Fred Feil Brewing Co. v. Blair
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
This motion is supported by the verified bill and moving affidavits of the plaintiff, and none of the defendants have filed counter affidavits nor answer. The facts for the purposes of this motion are, therefore, to be taken as those set out in the bill and affidavits.
The plaintiff, a corporation, has been engaged since September, 1906, in the manufacture and sale of malt and cereal beverages of a kind not in violation of the laws of the United States or the state of Pennsylvania. The Federal Prohibition Commissioner on May 23, 1922, issued to the plaintiff a permit…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Stroh Products Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1925
- Halpern v. AndrewsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- Fox v. BlairDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
- Camden County Beverage Co. v. WynneDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1931