Legal Opinion

Vidmar v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1981No. 80-410PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals, published at 99 Wis. 2d 398, 299 N.W.2d 288 *363(Ct. App. 1980), reversing a judgment of the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County: HAROLD B. JACKSON, JR., Circuit Judge, presiding.

The question on review is: Does a provision in an insurance policy that excludes coverage “for the operation of or damage, to non-owned automobiles” which are “emergency type automobiles” used or occupied by the insured in connection with his employment nullify the protection afforded to the insured by the uninsured motorists provisions of his auto policy.

We conclude…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co. v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Dairyland Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. BohenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API