Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Lansing Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1985No. 72216, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

In this case we are asked once again to interpret and apply the notice provision of the workers’ compensation act, which tolls the statute of limitations pertaining to filing for bene*91fits, if the employer has received notice of injury, but has not reported the injury to the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. MCL 418.381; MSA 17.237(381).

Facts

The facts giving rise to this action were aptly summarized by the wcab and are not in dispute:

Plaintiff was employed with defendant in the capacity of a janitor. During the winter months, this job required plaintiff to shovel coal for approximately two and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Norris v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Littleton v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. West v. Northern Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Krol v. City of HamtramckMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brewer v. a D Transport Express, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Colbert v. Conybeare Law OfficeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Feld v. Robert & Charles Beauty SalonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Murdock v. Michigan Health Maintenance OrganizationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Peck v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API