Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Feld v. Robert & Charles Beauty Salon

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1989No. Docket 97505PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

Plaintiff Sylvia Feld appeals by leave granted from a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board decision to dismiss her petition for compensation benefits. The two issues raised relate to whether plaintiff has a right to have her attorney present at a medical examination required by § 385 of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.101 et seq.; MSA 17.237(101) et seq., and, if present, whether her attorney may electronically record the audible portions of the medical examination as a note-taking device. The wcab held that plaintiff did not have the right to have her attorney present and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. King v. Director of the Midland County Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Crawford County v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Norris v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Feld v. Robert & Charles Beauty SalonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Paul v. BogleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ansell v. Department of Commerce (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. MICHIGAN Ex Rel OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Amerisure InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API