Legal Opinion

Vandeviere v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1938No. 26924PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of hog-stealing. His motion for new trial, based solely on the general grounds, was overruled and he excepted. Eeld:

1. After verdict, in passing upon the motion for a new trial, that view of the evidence which is most unfavorable to the accused must be taken, for every presumption and every inference is in favor of the verdict. Bell v. State, 21 Ga. App. 788 (95 S. E. 270).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

3. Although the evidence of the witnesses for the State contained contradictions, there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial. *19Cle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Clemons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Beecher v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Scott v. Imperial Hotel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API